Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Unhelpful clerks a result of individualism

U.S. Culture / Unhelpful clerks a result of individualism


Kimiko Manes Special to The Daily Yomiuri



Many Japanese, after living in the United States for a while, start to get frustrated about how inflexible things are. At first, I too felt this way. Whether it was shopping or legal procedures, I wondered why things were so inflexible. When I went to local government offices for an inquiry, if the person I needed to see wasn't there, others in the office frequently could not help.

The person at the next desk might say, "He/she (person in charge) is attending a meeting right now--he/she'll be back in half an hour." But beyond that, they wouldn't help. If it was just a half an hour wait, I considered myself lucky.

Sometimes I would get a reply like, "Sorry, this week she's on vacation, she'll be back next week." That was irritating when I had taken time out of my day to come to the office. "Isn't there anyone who can help me?" I would ask. "Unfortunately, that's her job," came the reply.

No one else could do that person's job, and I couldn't help comparing this with Japan, where anyone in the same department would be trained to help with most inquiries.
Department store clerks or employees in the United States won't be able to help if the inquiries are outside their own section. "That's not my job, so you'll have to ask the manager." Even then, will they call the manager for me? Not necessarily. Americans are used to this culture, so they'll just ask, "Oh, really? So where can I find the manager?" And just like that, they will start walking around looking for the manager.

Once, when I got a product that was different from what I ordered at a store and wanted to exchange it, employees processed the paperwork, but wouldn't say sorry or apologize for the inconvenience. I started to get irritated by the whole ordeal, but in the United States, unless you can talk to the person who made the error, there will be no apology forthcoming.

From my perspective as a Japanese, that seems inflexible and unkind. But in a society where the individual is the central unit, it's common sense.

When I first moved to the United States, I thought that maybe clerks and entry-level employees were inept and could not be trusted with complicated tasks. Therefore, I concluded that these people were placed under the control of the managers. But recently, I've started to figure out the logic behind the system, and begun to understand the fundamental differences in thinking between the Japanese and the Americans.

In the United States, the whole society is founded on the premise that individuals are given rights and responsibilities (although sometimes I think the "responsibilities" part has fallen by the wayside these days). If some work is given to an individual, he or she is responsible for completing it, and that responsibility must be respected: meddling with their work is a professional violation. Therefore, even if you work with someone in the same office, unless you are specifically asked for help, or directed by a supervisor to help, that individual is solely responsible for that work.

Of course, if there is a mistake, it is that individual's responsibility, and if the errors are too numerous or grave, one can get fired. Not helping coworkers, then, can be an act of respect for their work, and it is also a way to deflect responsibility in case their work turns out to be shoddy. This is the line between oneself and someone else's responsibility; anything that is out of an individual's jurisdiction, then, becomes "none of my business." This seems to be how an individualistic society works.

However, if you are given a task or agree to do a specific job, you are free to finish your work however you see fit. For example, a businessperson might be given a limit, say, "up to 1 million dollars" to complete a deal. If it is within that area, that person has the power to make decisions. How favorable the negotiated deal is might help that businessperson's career, but unlike Japan, he or she will not have to talk with the main office or "honsha."
If it looks like the deal is going to be more than the predetermined 1 million dollars limit, then that person must say, "I do not have the authority to make that decision, so I would like to arrange for further negotiations in the future." It's pretty straightforward.
In regards to privacy, there is a similar distinction, and there's a line where people do not get involved with others. One might term it the American equivalent of the Japanese line between "uchi" and "soto."

On the other hand, according to one American who resided in Japan for a long time, "When a foreigner goes to city hall or a bank in Japan, workers at the windows are extremely polite but they have to consult with other coworkers or supervisors before they can process the paperwork or transaction. Because the individual isn't given any sort of responsibility, they have to consult each other to make decisions."

He's absolutely correct. Unless it pertains to something very specific, individuals cannot make decisions easily in the Japanese workplace. Work tends to be done by groups in Japan, and everyone can do each other's work. To facilitate this, routines are set up. To oblige the foreigner who visits the city office, city workers might have to ask their coworkers and their supervisors if the routine set up for Japanese people will be appropriate for the foreigner.

Unlike the United States, most people in an office can help that person, but the placement of responsibility is unclear. Therefore, the Japanese tend not to favor changing routines, and sometimes even think that the routines cannot be changed.
People unconsciously form a paradigm to view the world around them, and they tend to prefer the system with which they are most familiar. It has taken me a long time to understand American society, and I think that there are many Japanese in the United States who never seem to understand how things "work." Similarly, I assume that some foreigners in Japan also take time to understand and accept how things are carried out in Japan.

Manes resides in Philadelphia and teaches Japanese at Bucks and Montgomery county community colleges. She is the author of "Culture Shock of Mind." (Sunmark Publishing Company; in Japanese). maneskim@gmail.com.
(Mar. 21, 2006)

No snakes in Ireland


Why aren't there any snakes in Ireland?: "Monday March 27,

Dear Yahoo!:

Why aren't there any snakes in Ireland? Keith East Hampton, Connecticut

Dear Keith:
Short answer: Because they can't swim and don't like the cold. No, nothing to do with St. Patrick.

Ireland isn't the only island without native snakes. New Zealand doesn't have any either (although it had a snaky reptile 20 million years ago). The only snakes near Hawaii are elusive sea snakes, and the island is pretty serious about keeping out the land varieties. We hear that Greenland and Antarctica are snake-free as well.

Without flippers or boats, snakes have a hard time migrating across oceans. While some islands were once part of larger land masses or connected by land bridges, cold weather and bad timing have conspired to keep snakes away from the green hills of Eire.

Researchers believe that snakes evolved about 100 million years ago on the super-continent Gondwanaland, which slowly broke into Antarctica, South America, Africa, India, and Australia. That helped snakes get around the world, although at that time, Ireland was still under the sea. As the waters receded, snakes found new and exciting homes, but not in Ireland.

Snakes are cold-blooded creatures, and they can't knit cozy sweaters to survive in Ireland's chill. The country was covered by glaciers for ages, and it only thawed about 15,000 years ago.

By then, no land bridges existed between England and Ireland, so any snakes pining for a Guinness were trapped in the land of fish and chips. "

Sunday, March 19, 2006

Advice for repeater visitors to Ireland

Northwest Ireland: Walks and Waterfalls


Kiss the Blarney Stone, have a pint at the Guinness Brewery and stay in a castle on a wind-swept green hillside. But if you want to see real Ireland, make a stop here.
By Sheila Flynn, Associated Press Writer

One Family's Guide to Ireland
Ireland, by Tour Bus

In a country chock-full of shops catering to tourists, much of the nation's Northwest remains untouched. And it boasts astounding scenery, friendly locals with strong rural accents and a sleepy peacefulness despite being near a surprising number of things to see and do.

The town of Blacklion in County Cavan, population 166, borders Northern Ireland and is a perfect example of one of the Northwest's quintessentially Irish towns—complete with a one-street strip peppered mostly with pubs, a small tourist center and not much else. It is Blacklion's location in picturesque lake country, as well as its proximity to various attractions, that make it a perfect stop for relaxation and sightseeing.

A walking path, snaking up from the town between two rather unremarkable buildings, could easily be missed by passers-by. But the path marks an entrance to the Cavan Way, a 16-mile trail that leads hikers through hills and valleys, past everything from crumbling stone houses to Megalithic ruins (ancient structures made from giant slabs of stone). Points of interest along the Way include the Shannon Pot, the tiny body of water that marks the start of the country's famed Shannon River, and forests where you can find ancient tombs and stone monuments.

Even just a partial tour of the Way, up from the town and down back onto the main road, provides trailgoers with breathtaking elevated views of cottage-dotted hills and sparkling lakes, all the while leading them past sheep-filled pastures and hauntingly beautiful abandoned cottages—the overgrown, forgotten remnants of families who "bought steam," leaving the area to immigrate by ship to America, England or Australia.

"It's an area that I think doesn't get a lot of attention from visitors, which kind of makes it even more special," said Tourism Ireland spokeswoman Ruth Moran, citing the path's attractions "from ancient times."

"Just from walking along there, people say that they get goosebumps."

And hungry hikers won't be disappointed with the culinary offerings in Blacklion, which happens to boast one of the country's premier gourmet restaurants, MacNean House & Bistro. Celebrity chef Neven Maguire, a familiar face on Irish television who also happens to be a local, places particular emphasis on incorporating regionally grown ingredients into creative contemporary Irish cuisine—drawing dining connoisseurs from across the country to the village. Restaurant hours vary, however, so diners should plan carefully and call ahead.

Visitors interested in more casual fare can stop into any of the multiple pubs in the town for a toasted sandwich or stroll to the local chipper, serving greasy food and fries across the bridge—which is also across the border, in the equally small town of Belcoo, in Northern Ireland's County Fermanagh. Along the way they'll pass the beauty salon that used to be the local one-room schoolhouse, and on the return trip visitors can stop into Blacklion's version of a general store, selling everything from postcards to Wellington boots to dolls—and whose owner, Harold Johnston, can provide more than a few bits and pieces of local history and anecdotes.

A stop in the local bars, which occasionally offer traditional music, will also give visitors the opportunity to enjoy a pint and chat with the locals—who will hurry to put out their cigarettes (banned in pubs nationally) when new faces enter.

Other attractions include touring the Marble Arch Caves and lake fishing. But one of the most impressive activities is as simple as a leisurely drive west along N16, the route from Blacklion to Sligo. The road winds through County Leitrim beneath canopies of trees and provides views of misty valleys and mountains. Scenic overlooks invite you to stop and take the perfect photograph.

About halfway through the hour-long drive, look for a small sign on the right for Glencar Waterfall. A narrow, twisting lane leads down the valley to the 50-foot falls, nestled near a clear, quiet cove called Lough Glencar. The peaceful lake and tranquil falls inspired William Butler Yeats to mention the waterfall in his poem "The Stolen Child."

The county of Sligo, itself, is a bit more popular with travelers, famous for its association with Yeats—who grew up in the area and is buried at Drumcliffe, under the mountain of Ben Bulben, which can be seen from the N16 drive. Signs directing you to the grave are everywhere in Sligo, which also boasts the Yeats Memorial Building on Hyde Bridge and other attractions for literary pilgrims. Visitors have their pick of restaurants and shopping in Sligo's town center, too.

But it is the drive back to the country—with the silence, scenery and sweet scent of peat burning on a fire somewhere as you pass by—that prove most memorable and that represent the real Ireland so many visitors hope to find.
If you go…

IRELAND'S NORTHWEST: http://www.irelandnorthwest.ie/ or (011) 353-71-916-1201. Tourism offices for Ireland in the U.S., (800) 223-6470.

CAVAN WAY: A 16-mile trail between Dowra and Blacklion in County Cavan; details under "Environment & Wildlife" at http://www.countycavan.com .

MACNEAN HOUSE & BISTRO: Main Street, Blacklion, County Cavan. Phone (011) 353-71-985-3404. Accommodations are also available above the restaurant, with five en suite rooms, about $48.

MARBLE ARCH CAVES: Marlbank, Florencecourt, County Fermanagh; http://www.marblearchcaves.net . Open from late March through September.

SLIGO: http://www.yeats-sligo.com/index.html or (011) 353-71-914-2693. Yeats Memorial Building located on Hyde Bridge in Sligo. Annual Yeats "summer school," with poetry readings and writing workshops, July 29-Aug. 11.

Friday, March 17, 2006

Saint Patrick's Day Traditions in the USA

Don't do it!















SAINT PATRICK'S DAY TRADITIONS in the USA
They differ sharply from what we do in Ireland.

SHAMROCK:
The most famous tradition associated with Saint
Patrick's Day is 'the wearing of the green'. It
is the custom of people of Irish descent, (or
indeed of anyone who wants to mark the day) to
wear a sprig of Shamrock. This humble plant is
one of the most famous symbols representing
Ireland, the Harp being the other.

THE PARADE:
The famous parade to mark Saint Patrick's day has
a long tradition. It is claimed that the first
such march held in the US took place in Boston
in 1737! It is very unlikely that any celebrations
were conducted in open during the 1700s and early
1800s in Ireland. This was the time of the 'penal
laws' when the Catholic religion was banned and
mass was conducted in secret. Children were
education in the open countryside in the infamous
'hedge schools'. In modern times parades of some
description are organised in nearly every major
city in the world. In recent years there have even
been parades in major English cities, a sure sign
of the ever-changing relationship that Ireland
has with her closest neighbour.

FOOD AND DRINK:
Corned Beef and Cabbage washed down by cold beer
may not be to everyone's taste but there is no
denying that the Irish culinary experience is at
its height (or depth!) on March 17th.

IRISH DANCING:
Traditional Irish dancing is certainly a part of
traditional Saint Patrick's Day. Most parades
have several dance troupes among their number
while many clubs and pubs around Ireland have
Irish dancing on this special Irish day.

SEAN THORNTON AND MARY KATE DANAHER

The 1952 classic film 'The Quiet Man' starring
Maureen O'Hara and John Wayne is wheeled out
annually by RTE (Irish Television) as well as
other TV stations around the world.

Other pots of Blarney that are revived on
March 17th include 'Darby O'Gill and the
Little People' and 'Into the West'.

IRISH TAOISEACH IN THE WHITE HOUSE:
Since 1980 the Irish leader (Taoiseach) has
presented the US PResident with a bowl of
Shamrock on every Saint Patrick's day.

GREEN EVERYWHERE:
Several cities mark this famous occasion by
dyeing their city river green! The result is
usually both bizarre and hideous but not as
hideous as witnessing a pint of Guinness
with green dye on it.

Sacrilege!

March 17

THE LIFE OF SAINT PATRICK The Patron Saint of Ireland was born into either a Scottish or English family in the fourth century. He was captured as a teenager by Niall of the Nine Hostages who was to become a King of all Ireland. He was sold into slavery in Ireland and put to work as a shepherd. He worked in terrible conditions for six years drawing comfort in the Christian faith that so many of his people had abandoned under Roman rule.



Patrick had a dream that encouraged him to flee
his captivity and to head South where a ship was
to be waiting for him. He traveled over 200
miles from his Northern captivity to Wexford
town where, sure enough, a ship was waiting to
enable his escape.

Upon arrival in England he was captured by
brigands and returned to slavery. He escaped
after two months and spent the next seven years
traveling Europe seeking his destiny.

During this time he furthered his education and
studied Christianity in the Lerin Monastery in
France. He returned to England as a priest.
Again a dream greatly influenced him when he
became convinced that the Irish people were
calling out to him to return to the land of
his servitude.

He went to the Monastery in Auxerre where it
was decided that a mission should be sent to
Ireland. Patrick was not selected for this task
to his great disappointment. The monk that was
selected was called Paladius, but he died before
he could reach Ireland and a second mission was
decided upon.

Patrick was made a Bishop by Pope Celestine in
the year 432 and, together with a small band of
followers, he traveled to Ireland to commence
the conversion.

Patrick confronted the most powerful man in
Ireland, Laoghaire, The High King of Tara, as
he knew that if he could gain his support then
he would be safe to spread the word throughout
Ireland. To get his attention Patrick and his
followers lit a huge fire to mark the commencement
of Spring. Tradition had it that no fire was to
be lit until the King's fire was complete, but
Patrick defied this rule and courted the
confrontation with the King.

The King rushed into action and traveled with the
intention of making war on the holy delegation.
Patrick calmed the King and with quiet composure
impressed upon him that he had no intention other
than that of spreading the word of the Gospel.
The King accepted the missionary, much to the
dismay of the Druids who feared for their own
power and position in the face of this new threat.
They commanded that he make snow fall. Patrick
declined to do so stating that this was God's
work. Immediately it began to snow, only stopping
when Patrick blessed himself.

Still trying to convince the King of his religion
Patrick grasped at some Shamrock growing on the
ground. He explained that there was but one stem
on the plant, but three branches of the leaf,
representing the Blessed Trinity. The King was
impressed with his sincerity and granted him
permission to spread the word of his faith,
although he did not convert to Christianity
himself.

Patrick and his followers were free to spread
their faith throughout Ireland and did so to great
effect. He drove paganism (symbolised by the
snake) from the lands of Eireann.

Patrick was tempted by the Devil whilst on a
pilgrimage at Croagh Patrick. For his refusal to
be tempted, God rewarded him with a wish. Patrick
asked that the Irish be spared the horror of
Judgment Day and that he himself be allowed to
judge his flock. Thus, the legend that Ireland
will disappear under a sea of water seven years
before the final judgment, was born.

Patrick died on March 17th in the year 461 at the
age of 76. It is not known for sure where his
remains were laid although Downpatrick in County
Down in the North of Ireland is thought to be
his final resting place.

His influence is still felt to this day as Nations
the world over commemorate him on March 17th of
every year.

noise pollution and aural health

An interesting but extended article about aural health. Particularly if you have to do long commutes everyday. The link was http://health.msn.com/menshealth/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100125842

Is Your Life Too Loud?

---------------------------------------------------------

You won't believe just how loud everyday sounds really are and what kind of toll they're taking
by Tom McGrath, MSNBC Health; Photograph by Joshua Scott




After six hours in a roaring jet, three in a rattling car, one on a thrumming ferry, and 45 minutes hiking down a dark, damp path, I am sitting on a rock in the middle of a forest, listening to nothing at all. It's at this point that I understand what the heck Gordon Hempton was trying to tell me.

This is not just any forest, I should point out. It's Hoh Rain Forest, inside Washington's Olympic National Park, a patch of earth that may contain the quietest place in America. Says who? Well, this takes us back to Hempton, a naturalist type I spoke to before coming out here. Hempton, who makes his living recording the sounds of nature, has started a campaign to preserve quiet places inside America's national parks. The first place he has certified as being almost completely free of manmade noise: a single square inch of soil just down the path from where I'm sitting.

"The extinction of quiet places is rapidly outpacing that of endangered species," Hempton told me on the phone, from his home near Puget Sound. When I asked him why it was so crucial that we preserve such places, he sighed heavily. "Even to ask that shows how far we've been removed from nature."

I mumbled something in agreement, even as I thought to myself that he hadn't exactly answered my question. But now, sitting on this rock, listening to the birds chirp and a nearby stream trickle past, I think I'm beginning to get it.

There's little question that the world has grown louder in recent generations, thanks to everything from the jets that roar over our heads to the iPods that blast in our ears. The problem? Evidence is mounting that our bodies might not be ready for this kind of rumble. Not only are hearing problems on the rise—at last count, more than 30 million Americans had some kind of hearing loss—but research suggests that noise, even relatively low-level noise, may be destroying our health. Specifically, it's believed to play a significant role in everything from sleep disorders and stress responses to high blood pressure and heart disease. Noise, it seems, may be quietly killing us.

Still, I can't say I completely grasped all this until I sat here, away from manmade sounds for probably the first time in my life. Indeed, two things strike me: first, that the 11 hours I spent getting here was actually a form of time travel, since what I'm hearing on this rock today animals, water, wind is exactly what I would have heard had I sat here a century or a millennium ago. More important, my body seems thankful that we have at long last come to a place like this. The sound of all this nothingness is incredibly soothing—in the manner of a tooth that at last stops aching or a low-grade fever that finally breaks. I scrawl "BIG FLUFFY PILLOWS" in my notebook, because it feels as if I have them pressed against my ears.

Aural history

It's tough to say precisely how much louder the world is today than it was a few generations ago, but Emily Thompson assures us that it is. Thompson is a professor at the University of California at San Diego and one of the leaders in the burgeoning field of aural history (essentially, the study of how the world has sounded through the years).

"If you lived in a city in the late 19th century, the sounds you heard were mostly organic—people talking, animals making noise," she says. In contrast, by the 1920s, the sounds of the city had become mostly mechanical—factories groaning and grunting, cars putt-putting around the streets, even an occasional plane sputtering overhead. The racket was so loud—or perhaps so foreign to all those delicate, 19th-century-reared ears—that anti-noise groups actually sprang up in the 1920s, though in the end their solution was less about making things quieter than about finding ways to block out the noise through architecture and various other methods. "This was really when the study of acoustics took off," says Thompson, whose book, The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900-1933, surveys these earliest attempts to muffle the country.

In the eight decades since, the world has become exponentially louder. Consider Gordon Hempton's findings: In 1984, he identified 21 places in his home state of Washington that were essentially quiet—that is, they experienced no manmade noise for at least 15 minutes a day. By 1989, thanks to more cars and more air traffic, that number had dropped to just three places.

"It's an unusual experience to hear absolutely nothing," says Elliott Berger, an acoustical scientist and the editor of the last two editions of The Noise Manual, a textbook for the audiology community. "It seems we rarely can or do give ourselves the opportunity to appreciate complete silence."

Still, the background noise that bombards us 24-7 is only one contributor to the increasing cacophony. There's also the technology we use to entertain ourselves from multiplex theaters to megawatt amplifiers and the fact that it allows us to turn the volume higher than at any other time in history.

In the 1950s, the average sound level in a movie theater was about 70 to 75 decibels. Now, thanks to advances in sound engineering that have made it possible to amplify noises without distorting them, the average movie sound level is 85 decibels, with scenes in some action pictures (basically anything directed by Michael Bay) spiking as high as 130 decibels. That's only a few decibels less than a jackhammer.

Car stereos are also easier to blare, compared with those in the era of in-dash eight-tracks. "A standard car radio had anywhere from 4 to 5 watts or 80 decibels in the '60s, but a factory radio today has around 80 watts or 102 decibels," says Steve Conner, an audio engineer at Delphi Electronics & Safety, which supplies car stereos to GM. "Some 'tuner' cars with tricked-out stereo systems can reach up to 120 decibels. An hour or so at that level is equivalent to a rock concert."

But again, that's one of today's concerts. If you could flash back to 1976 to hear a gig by the Guinness-certified "loudest rock band in the world," The Who, you'd probably be underwhelmed by their sound system. You might even call Townshend and crew "subdued" (though Pete's hearing loss shows it was loud enough onstage).

"When I started in the 1970s, state-of-the-art amplifiers had 150 to 300 watts powering each channel," says Mark Frink, a longtime concert sound engineer and a contributor to Mix magazine, which covers sound technology. "Today, amplifiers have 2,000 or 3,000 watts, and you use 80 or 100 amplifiers for an arena show. That's 300,000 watts of power." The reason, Frink says, is simple: A louder, more powerful show is a more stimulating, memorable show. "If you work in the concert business, people look at you askance if you ever ask, 'Hey, is this too loud?' "

Frink also notes that cranking up the volume can help a performer compensate for lack of talent. "The louder the sound, the harder it is to distinguish pitch. So if you have a singer who can't sing or a guitar player who can't play, just have the sound guy turn it up and he'll sound better." Yes, Ashlee Simpson, we're onto you.

Thanks to portable stereos, we can hear all those lousy singers and guitarists whenever we want and at dangerously loud levels. When Boston University researchers recently tested nine different combinations of portable CD players and headphones, they discovered that at full volume, some pairings actually exceeded 130 decibels. In these earsplitting instances, the study reports, the common culprit turned out to be "insert headphones" the type you see plugged into the head of nearly everyone toting an MP3 player.

"The smaller the headset, the closer to the eardrum, and the more likely it is to cause hearing damage," says study author Clarke Cox, Ph.D. "The popularity of MP3 players is a particular concern, because they can hold more songs than a normal CD, exposing you to that damaging sound longer."

There is, however, one group that benefits from our blasting MP3 players: thieves. In 2005, nine iPods were stolen from subway passengers in Boston because the victims couldn't hear the criminals coming.

Never have I felt so good about being a late adopter of technology.

Turn down that racket

After my brief encounter with absolute silence, I decided to find out how much noise I take in on a typical day. So I bought a sound meter at Radio Shack and carried it with me, recording the various sound levels I heard. (Fair warning: My $59 meter is not exactly a finely tuned machine, but it does provide a rough picture of how loud things are; think of the following measurements as aural stick figures.)

The first sign of trouble came at 6:45 a.m. in my own kitchen, as my two daughters, ages 6 and 3, began debating loudly what they were going to eat for breakfast. "I don't like Cheerios. I want Lucky Charms!" the 3-year-old yelled. The 6-year-old followed with, "How come she gets to have Lucky Charms?" Standing about two feet away, I looked down at my noise meter, which registered 74 decibels. Is that bad? Well, let's put it this way: Noise experts say anything around 80 decibels incites a stress response in your body. No wonder I was considering trading my coffee mug for a martini glass.

The real revelation, however, came when I got into my car about half an hour later. For six years, I had a two-hour work commute, during which time I amused myself by either listening to talk radio or, more commonly, cranking up the music on my Toyota Tercel's car stereo. I always had some sense that the music was fairly loud — mostly because whenever my wife got in the car, she would bellow, "This is REALLY LOUD!" but I never realized how loud until I switched on my noise meter and popped in U2's How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb. Driving around my neighborhood was bad enough—the meter registered 84 decibels—but things were worse when I hit the highway and turned up the volume so I could hear the music over the road noise. Suddenly, I was being blasted by 100 decibels, with spikes of 108 decibels whenever Bono really got into it.

The rest of the day held similar sound surprises. The Starbucks where I buy my coffee and read the paper: 82 decibels. The crowded restaurant where I ate lunch: 86 decibels. A typical street in Center City Philadelphia, where my office is: 79 decibels.

What's curious is that, with the possible exception of my kids screaming, none of these noises seemed particularly loud to me. And that's part of the problem when it comes to our health. While our bodies are great at protecting us from many dangers—touch a hot stove, for instance, and your hand will reflexively recoil before you're burned any worse—they're not so great at protecting us from things that are too loud. Yes, you will start to feel pain in your ears when the noise level is 125 decibels, but damage is done well before that, at 85 decibels.

"Noise is something we can habituate to," says Berger. "Hearing is similar to smell in that way you can walk into a bad-smelling room and get used to it pretty quickly."

Noise-induced stress

Though we may not notice noise and may even willingly expose ourselves to it, our brains generally interpret loud sounds as a threat. "Any sound in the hazardous range increases the stress response in your body," says Robert Fifer, Ph.D., director of audiology at the University of Miami's Mailman Center for Child Development. Among the physiological responses to loud noise that studies have documented: increased heart and breathing rates, heightened blood pressure, greater levels of stress hormones in the bloodstream, and increased brain activity.

Now, on one hand, this sort of reaction is a good thing, since it's what makes us turn our heads when we hear a blaring car horn or wake up when we hear a loud noise in our houses at night. But putting ourselves on this kind of alert all the time—which can happen when we're constantly exposed to loud noise—has a debilitating effect on the body.

In 1998, for example, Cornell University environmental psychologist Gary Evans, Ph.D., published a study of third- and fourth-graders who lived near the newly opened airport in Munich, Germany. (Half of the children lived under flight patterns; the other half lived in quieter areas.) His findings: The children in the chronic-noise group experienced significant increases in blood pressure and levels of stress hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol) over two years, while the children in the quiet areas showed no significant changes. Four years later, Evans published a second study involving another group of kids near the same airport, this one finding that those routinely exposed to airplane noise had impaired reading ability and long-term memory. "Stress hormones can cause any individual—child or adult—to become fatigued much faster than normal," says Fifer. "When that happens, the person can't learn effectively."

It would be logical to assume, then, that regularly blasting CDs inside a car is as bad for our health as being exposed to the distant drone of jet engines, if not worse. If that's the case, then we should all heed my wife's advice and turn the volume down—except that the road noise that would remain wouldn't be much better. In the past decade, at least eight studies have found a heightened stress response among people routinely exposed to traffic noise, and not necessarily at booming levels. (Sound levels ranged from 50 to 70 decibels.) Worse, the stress reaction lingered in many of them even after they'd parked their cars.

In other words, the health effects of sound may, literally, echo through our bodies. And, in fact, recent research supports this notion. A study in the Journal of Occupational Health took nighttime readings on workers who were exposed to loud sounds during the day. The results: Not only was the workers' sleep quality worse, but their nighttime heart rates never dropped as low as those of people not exposed to noise, and their cortisol levels were still elevated the following morning.

The long-term consequences of all this noise-induced stress are tough to pin down, but among the possibilities is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Though few large population-based studies have been done investigating the link, two years ago German scientists analyzed the existing research and concluded that there was an elevated risk of heart disease for anyone routinely exposed to sound levels over 65 decibels.

I like U2, but not that much.

Bad vibrations

Surprisingly, some researchers argue that our hearts can also be hurt by noise we can hardly hear. The culprit: low-frequency sound waves that, while relatively silent to our ears, may cause a fatal thickening of the heart walls and coronary blood vessels.

"The biggest effect we see is the abnormal growth of collagen, the steel of the body," says Mariana Alves-Pereira, Ph.D., a researcher at the New University of Lisbon, in Portugal. "Our hypothesis is that this is the body trying to stabilize itself against the vibrations of the noise. If I grab you by the shoulders and try to shake you, your instinct is to grab onto something. Basically, this is what your body is doing. It's trying to re-inforce its structural integrity."

Most cases of what's termed "vibroacoustic disease" have been diagnosed in pilots, but Alves-Pereira believes that the phenomenon is much more widespread, since low-frequency noise is everywhere—factories, air conditioners, even cars. "The noise in cars is incredible," she says. "It's actually greater than in an aircraft cockpit."

Alves-Pereira plans additional research on vibroacoustic disease, but in the meantime, what may be the world's largest case study of the syndrome has already taken place in Kokomo, Indiana. In the past several years, a number of the city's 50,000 residents have been suffering from health problems ranging from headaches to increased blood pressure—problems some have attributed to noise dubbed the "Kokomo Hum."

Jim Cowan, a senior consultant for the acoustical research firm Acentech, was hired by the City of Kokomo to investigate the hum in November 2002. Nine months later, he located two industrial fans in the area that were emitting low-frequency sounds. Even though quieting the fans didn't solve everyone's health complaints, Cowan believes that some of the residents may have been suffering from vibroacoustic disease. "Since I became involved in the Kokomo project, I've received calls from people all over the world who are hearing a hum and complaining of the same symptoms."

While many remain skeptical about vibroacoustic disease—they say the evidence isn't yet solid enough—there are other examples of low-frequency noise having a dramatic impact on the body. Last year, the journal Thorax reported on several men whose lungs were ruptured by the vibrations from loud music. One was at a club, another at a concert. A third had a 1,000-watt "bass box" in his car.

Perhaps more disturbing, noise not only can put you in the hospital, but also is likely to follow you there. Doctors at Johns Hopkins Hospital recently found that the sound level at more than 20 hospitals worldwide exceeds the limit set by the World Health Organization by an average of 20 decibels. One location at Johns Hopkins itself reached 70 decibels, high enough, say the researchers, to delay wound healing.

The solution you hear most frequently from hearing advocates is for all of us to be much more vigilant about protecting ourselves from loud noise. This means not only becoming more aware of what sounds can harm us, but also actively taking steps to avoid or block out those sounds.

"I'd like to see earplugs become as common as sunglasses or sunscreen," says Laurie Hanin, director of the League for the Hard of Hearing, in New York City. The problem, of course, is that earplugs will never look as sexy as sunglasses, nor is there nearly as much money to be made selling cheap foam ear protection as there is selling $10 bottles of Coppertone.

A tougher, but in the end more effective, remedy might be to reduce the amount of noise we make in the first place—and not just by putting a decibel cap on the Green Days of the world. "There's technology out there that will make the world quieter," says Les Blomberg, head of the Noise Pollution Clearinghouse, an activist group. He cites things like car tires that give off fewer decibels and rubberized road surfaces that will reduce noise further. He also says we could change air-traffic routes to keep noise down—a measure that may be gaining political support. Last year, New York Congressman Joseph Crowley, whose district includes LaGuardia Airport, introduced a bill that would create the Airport Noise Curfew Commission, which would help set curfews on planes flying over populated areas during normal sleeping hours.

And there are other examples of effective noise reduction. In 2003, soon after discovering that the sound effects on some kids' toys reached as high as 120 decibels, the League for the Hard of Hearing pushed the Toy Industry Association to agree to limits of 90 decibels. France, meanwhile, has laws prohibiting the sale of any personal stereo playing louder than 100 decibels—which forced Apple to build a quieter iPod for sale exclusively in that country.

Still, quieting things down won't be easy. One of the most popular Internet downloads among iPod owners in France is the goPod—a program that lets you override the built-in volume limit.

Read More From MSN Health & Fitness:

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Irish Pubs

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/features/scene/20060311TDY12001.htm

Home>Features>Scene

Irish pubs the best--bar none
Cameron McLauchlan / Daily Yomiuri Staff Writer

Until 1993, anybody hankering for a pint of Kilkenny or Guinness and some craic at an authentic Irish pub in Japan would most likely have died of thirst while they searched. It wasn't until Murphy's opened in Chuo Ward, Osaka, in November that year that patrons finally had somewhere to down a few beverages in surroundings reminiscent of the Emerald Isle. And in April 1995, Paddy Foley's in Roppongi, Tokyo, became the first pub in Japan pieced together by Irish builders and painters especially sent over to build a pub modeled on a traditional design, right down to the authentic bric-a-brac.

A decade or so later, the thirst for Irish pubs seems almost unquenchable. According to Takashi Toyama, a representative of Enterprise Ireland, about 70 Irish pubs now dot the country, 40 of which opened in the past five years. This equates to about one pub per 25 Irish people registered with the embassy here.

"Customers are looking for a cozy, warm atmosphere with Irish music," Murphy's Dublin-born manager Michael O'Carroll said by telephone.

Taro Maeda, president of New Tokyo Restaurant Co., which operates Duffy's in Ginza, Tokyo, said the expansion of Irish pubs is a trend indicative of changing lifestyles.

"Many people don't want to stand on formality anymore when they go out, but they want to do something trendy," Maeda said. "Irish pubs, with their casual, friendly atmosphere, fit the bill nicely."

Having a top-quality menu also is indispensible for running an Irish pub, he added.

Complementing this change--and reinforcing it--was the 2002 soccer World Cup finals. The games were the biggest impetus behind the seemingly relentless expansion of Irish pubs in the past few years, said Yoshinori Wakabayashi, general manager of The Dubliners pub in Otemachi, Tokyo, which opened in November 2003.

"The excitement generated by the fans visiting for the World Cup really kick-started people's awareness of Irish pubs," he said. "Interacting with fans from overseas over a drink really helped people learn about the beauty of an Irish pub."

Irish pubs today are a fluctuating mix of Japanese and non-Japanese of a mostly younger age bracket. Maeda said about 30 percent of Duffy's clientele are non-Japanese, while Wakabayashi said the ratio varies among the Dubliners pubs but averages about a 50-50 split. And while businessmen tend to be the main guests at the Dubliners pubs in Otemachi and Akasaka, you'd struggle to find a suit at the Shinjuku and Ikebukuro bars, which attract patrons mostly in their 20s and 30s.

But an Irish pub would not be an Irish pub without Guinness, and Japan's taste for the stout has been growing since Sapporo Breweries Ltd. began importing and selling it in 1964. These pubs in this country have turbocharged the demand for Guinness and Kilkenny, with sales of the brews at Irish pubs here showing the highest growth in Asia, according to Toyama.

For Irish bar operators, success can hinge on finding bar staff able to fulfill the staple role of being happy to chat with the customers--an aspect inherent in genuine Irish pubs that leaves their imitators green with envy. Several, such as Paddy Foley's, have Irish managers, ensuring the pubs stay true to their roots.

"Just having a place for customers to stand and serving Guinness doesn't make an Irish pub," said Hiroko Ueno, an assistant manager of the corporate planning department of Sapporo Lion Inc., which operates the seven Dubliners pubs in Tokyo. "The beauty of an Irish pub is the staff's closeness with the customers...they are more like friends. It shouldn't just be a restaurant you go to eat and drink--it has more of a family feel, where you go to meet people."

Indeed, not every Irish bar is guaranteed success. Although the circumstances vary, the Shamrock in Kichijoji, Tokyo, closed down recently and two Dubliners bars in Kobe and Osaka were wound up a few years after opening.

But Ueno believes there is a huge untapped customer base that will whip up the craic, the lively atmosphere of a pub in which conversation mingles with the music and clinking glasses.

"I took a friend to a pub recently and they asked me, 'What's Guinness?'" Ueno said. "I realized there are still people out there who don't know about [Irish pub culture]. I think there's room for growth yet."

Now that's worth drinking to.

Slainte!

(Mar. 11, 2006)

Cashing out...

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/living/columnists/ana_veciana_suarez/13949596.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

IN MY OPINION
Big dreams are made of this

Ana Veciana-Suarez
from the MiamiHerald Posted on Sat, Feb. 25, 2006

If you're reading this, the likelihood is you didn't win last weekend's $365 million Powerball jackpot, the biggest payout in U.S. history. Your life remains the same old, same old. Your dream home (by the beach, in the mountains, somewhere far from the bustle) is still on hold. Shucks.

Eight workers at a Nebraska meat processing plant, not you or me, claimed the record winnings this week, meaning each will get about $15.5 million after taxes. It took them four days to come forward, enough time for many of us to entertain thoughts about what we would do with all that money. Those daydreams say plenty about our hearts' desires.

But first, a little perspective about sudden millions. Winning the lottery, some would have you believe, is not all it's cracked up to be. According to fable, sudden wealth is more curse than blessing, more shackles than liberating key. Read some of the recent postings addressed to the new millionaires:

``Move to Tahiti. Don't tell anyone. Live discreetly. And most of all tell your begging friends to go win their own lottery.''

``You will make your children and family targets of kidnapping and blackmail attempts with this amount of money. Take time, do some research, and find very serious, knowledgeable and trustworthy council (sic) . . .''

Such warnings, however dismal, bear some truth. Seventy percent of those who become suddenly wealthy squander it within a few short years, according to the National Endowment for Financial Education. And about one-third of lottery winners eventually declare bankruptcy -- so says the Certified Financial Planners Board of Standards.

There are plenty of individual examples. Jack Whittaker, who won $315 million in 2002, had $545,000 stolen at a strip bar, had several run-ins with the law and lost a granddaughter to a drug overdose. Evelyn Adams won the New Jersey lottery twice in the mid-1980s, but still managed to lose the entire $5.4 million and reportedly lives in a trailer. The late William ''Bud'' Post II, who won $16.2 million in a Pennsylvania payout, was successfully sued by his girlfriend for a third of the winnings, fired a shotgun over a bill collector's head, failed at several businesses with his siblings, and then -- to add insult to injury -- his own brother was convicted of trying to kill him. In short, money earned suddenly and without effort can be unlucky.

Yet, who doesn't dream of becoming an instant multimillionaire, of calling a mansion home and parking a fleet of cars in the garage, of traveling the globe in luxury, of ensuring the family's future? Sure, money can't buy happiness, can't even assure us of true love, but, let's be honest, it does provide options, possibilities.

Which brings me to the dreams adults entertain when flights of fancy turn to windfalls. How would my friends behave? Sure, they would splurge on the vacation home and the newer car but, much to my surprise, most everybody would continue working. Maybe not at the same job. Maybe not for others. Maybe not the same amount of hours and days. But almost to the person, they would choose To Do.

One wants to start her own business. Another wants to run his own foundation, a third to return to school. Many want to chase the dreams they abandoned in youth, when earning a paycheck ruled out an artistic life. All would give a portion of their winnings away.

I find those responses uplifting and pragmatic, for they recognize two verities of life: Things are not as important as experiences and, in the end, you can live only so long without structure and routine.

Dictators of taste

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0603040234mar05,1,2755769.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
Dictators of taste
Your favorite film can say a lot about your personality

By Mark Jacob
the Tribune's foreign/national news editor

March 5, 2006

If "The Godfather" is your favorite film, these may be difficult days. That's because it's also the favorite movie of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Il, the secretive North Korean leader. Outside the "axis of evil," lesser pariahs also are fans of the film, including disgraced and convicted Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

As Hollywood prepares to honor another year of cinema at the Academy Awards on Sunday, it is fitting to look at what the movies say about our time and whether favorite films reflect the personalities of their admirers.

Consider: One candidate to succeed Pope John Paul II last year was Belgium's Cardinal Godfried Danneels. His favorite film reportedly was "The Silence of the Lambs."

Michael Jackson's best-loved movie is a children-in-peril drama, "To Kill a Mockingbird."

In other instances, favorite films tend to reinforce the public images of politicians and celebrities.

It's easy to imagine Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher enjoying the hard-hitting war drama "Saving Private Ryan." It seems almost logical that wife murderer Scott Peterson likes "The Shining." There's no surprise that Dick Cheney likes the 1948 shoot-'em-up "Red River."

And we'd likely be disappointed if John Paul II didn't love "Life Is Beautiful." On the other hand, baseball star Barry Bonds cites "The Ten Commandments."

A top pick for President Bush, once an owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, is the baseball movie "Field of Dreams."

Favorites such as these can be amusing, but do they mean anything? Bernard Luskin thinks so. The director of the Media Psychology Program at Fielding Graduate University in Santa Barbara, Calif., Luskin says people's favorite movies are noteworthy because "you always go in the direction of your own beliefs and your own ethics." Luskin isn't surprised Hussein and Kim enjoy "The Godfather."

"They see themselves as benevolent dictators. It's about power," he said. And he believes Bush's admiration for "Field of Dreams" is laudable: "I think that speaks well of him, in the sense that he has a vision of positive outcomes and goodness."

Jerrold Post, a former CIA analyst who is director of the Political Psychology Program at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., also believes movies are valid character indicators.

"What a person watches is telling," he said. "Kim and Saddam's taste in movies may provide insights in their concepts of leadership."

North Korea's leader is especially influenced by films, Post said, and has a collection of 15,000 to 20,000 movies.

"At times it seems as if he has modeled his foreign policy postures after movies, such as `High Noon' or `Gunfight at the O.K. Corral,'" he said. "The way he confronts the West with nuclear threats in order to extract financial and other concessions reminds me of the Peter Sellers movie `The Mouse That Roared,' in which a tiny country invades the United States so it will get foreign aid."

Luskin and Post aren't the only ones taking the movies seriously. After all, films have influenced fashion, language, even matters of life and death. "Taxi Driver" inspired John Hinckley to shoot President Ronald Reagan. Former Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlass admitted that he was such a fan of Italian film star Gina Lollobrigida that he asked his Lebanese allies in 1983 not to attack Italian peacekeeping troops "so that not a single tear may fall from Gina Lollobrigida's eyes."

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas so enjoys his favorite film that he likes to show it to his law clerks. That movie is "The Fountainhead," based on the Ayn Rand novel about an architect who blows up a housing complex that he designed because the builder compromised on his vision.

"The Godfather," however, is one movie that pervades American life. At DePaul University, a business course analyzes the film as a study in "organizational design." In North Carolina, a popular rock band is named The Moe Greens, after a character in the movie.

As Post puts it: "Many of us enjoy `The Godfather.' That doesn't make us psychopathic killers."

Among the movie's fans: perky actress Kate Hudson.

- - -

Like `High Noon'? So do ...

... Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and former President Bill Clinton, who named this western their favorite movie. Other moviegoing parties who share a favorite film are listed below. Can you guess which group picked which film? (P.S. One group couldn't agree.)

1. Gov. Rod Blagojevich, former President Jimmy Carter, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice

2. Soccer star Freddy Adu and former Senate candidate Alan Keyes

3. Basketball stars Kobe Bryant and Yao Ming, convicted Enron exec Andrew Fastow

4. Tribune film critic Michael Wilmington; Sun-Times film critic Roger Ebert

5. Wife murderer Scott Peterson, Washington-area sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, Adolf Hitler

6. Chef Paul Prudhomme, child actress Dakota Fanning, country singer Lee Ann Womack, television mogul Ted Turner, former CNN anchor Judy Woodruff

A. "Lord of the Rings"

B. "Casablanca"

C. "Gone With The Wind"

D. "Star Wars"

E. "Citizen Kane"

F. Couldn't agree




THE ANSWERS
1. B; 2. A; 3. D; 4. E; 5. F; 6. C

(Peterson likes "The Shining," Malvo "The Matrix," Dahmer "The Exorcist III" and Hitler "King Kong." There is no evidence whether the popcorn ordered was buttered.)

----------

Mark Jacob is the Tribune's foreign/national news editor. He compiled the stars' favorite movies over recent years, so they may have changed now that "Curious George" and "The Pink Panther" have hit theaters.

Monday, March 13, 2006

Article on the movie Terminal


If you're interested here are a couple of sites that relate to the movie 'Terminal':
A VERY positive review
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117924107?categoryid=31&cs=1

and a very funny but slightly negative review
http://www.austin360.com/movies/content/movies/reviews/t/terminal_ladn.html
Finally if you want to read a very balanced view and description of the movie, try IMDB (Internet movie database)http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362227/



By Scott Foundas.
Though history may regard it as more of an in-flight snack than a full-course meal, Steven Spielberg's spirit-lifting "The Terminal" comes along at just the right moment. With cinemas currently providing little refuge from disasters both natural and manmade, this buoyant, optimistic fable seems to share in the late Ronald Reagan's optimism for America. It does so with the help of a gifted comic ensemble led by Tom Hanks as an immigrant unable to leave in a New York City airport. Ideal counterprogramming against the season's bombastic blockbusters, pic should quickly pilot its way to the helmer's usual numbers for non-genre fare.
Fanciful as it sounds, the premise of "The Terminal" is rooted in fact -- specifically, the case of Iranian expatriate Merhan Karimi Nessari, who has, since 1988, resided in Terminal 1 of Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport. (Previously, Nessari's story was the inspiration for the 1994 French pic "Lost in Transit.")
Here, Hanks plays the Messari-inspired Viktor Navorski, who touches down on American soil only to discover that, during his flight, a political coup occurred in his fictional Eastern European homeland. Informed by businesslike Homeland Security officer Frank Dixon (well played by Stanley Tucci) that he is unable to return home or to seek asylum in the U.S. until our government recognizes the new regime, Viktor is ordered to stay put in the airport.
Dixon reasons it's only a matter of time before his virtual prisoner escapes into the Big Apple and becomes some other agency's problem. But Viktor wants to enter the U.S. legally, for unspecified reasons that may concern the tin of Planters peanuts he carries around like a family heirloom.
Restricted to the confines of the airport's glittering, glass-and-steel international transit area, Viktor patiently goes about making himself a home, while the film evolves into a gentle satire of the dilemmas of immigration and the resilience of this new American's entrepreneurial spirit.
Because Viktor is depicted, in these early passages, as barely speaking a word of English, Hanks' Viktor becomes something of a silent observer, bemusedly soaking up the spectacle of harried travelers. Performance resonates with an underplayed, deadpan grace closer to Hanks' solo scenes in "Cast Away" than to his broadly comic turn in the Coen Brothers' "Ladykillers" remake. Yet, the role also affords the actor some of the best opportunities for physical comedy that he's had since "Big," and he pulls them off with unselfconscious ease. Even Viktor's thick, vaguely Russian accent hardly seems a distraction, precisely because he doesn't say very much.
Screenplay slyly observes the terminal as a home to an entire community of uprooted persons -- from Indian emigre janitor Gupta (scene-stealing Wes Anderson regular Kumar Pallana), who takes perverse pleasure in watching people slip across his freshly-waxed floors, to Mexican food-service worker Enrique (Diego Luna), who pines for the affections of a beautiful Customs officer (Zoe Saldana).
There's also knockout United Airlines flight attendant Amelia Warren (Catherine Zeta-Jones), whose meet-cute with Viktor owes itself to a waxy, Gupta-generated tumble. Embroiled in an unsatisfying affair with a married man (Michael Nouri), she finds herself drawn to Viktor's honesty and warmth, and able to relate to his feeling of living in an airport (which she initially mistakes as a metaphor).
Yet, while Viktor and Amelia continue to rendezvous, their relationship becomes neither the focal point of "The Terminal" nor a full-blown romance. And while Zeta-Jones is excellent at revealing Amelia's sad, delicate dimensions, she ultimately isn't in that much of the movie. Of course, that's part of pic's point -- that in this crazy, mixed-up world, we rarely have time to stop and savor the things that really matter.
For a movie about a man whose very nationality lingers in limbo for months, "The Terminal" lacks any significant sense of conflict, and an 11th-hour subplot involving Art Kane's famous Harlem jazz portrait feels like something out of left field. But at its best, "The Terminal" finds Spielberg working in the breezy, freewheeling fashion that dates back to his early "The Sugarland Express" and his recent "Catch Me if You Can."
Spielberg does not appear to take himself or the material too seriously, and his steadfast refusal to see the proverbial glass as less than half-full is more inspiring than cloying. In Spielberg's world, it's possible for an immigrant to learn fluent English by reading a Fodor's travel guide. And, in a summer when the likes of "Troy" and "The Stepford Wives" are what pass for old-fashioned Hollywood entertainment, it's a pleasure to spend time there.
Astonishingly, pic's massive, detail-perfect set is just that -- not a real airport terminal at all, but an exact replica constructed by production designer Alex McDowell in a Palmdale, Calif., aerospace hanger. (A few exteriors were shot in Montreal.)
Though relatively minor compared to his superb work on the new "Harry Potter" pic, John Williams' score still offers an enjoyable coupling of typically Holst-ian fanfares and more adventurous, klezmer-influenced riffs.
Perhaps pic's greatest technical pleasure, however, is the lustrous, color-saturated cinematography of regular Spielberg lenser Janusz Kaminski, whose work here registers at the opposite end of the spectrum from his signature faded hues and blown-out lighting schemes, resulting in a visual luxuriance that harks back to Spielberg's classic collaborations with d.p. Allen Daviau ("E.T.," "The Color Purple," "Empire of the Sun").

Next review...

By Glenn WhippLos Angeles Daily News
Posted: June 18, 2004
Steven Spielberg wants to make you smile with his new movie "The Terminal," which should be all the warning you need to avoid this troubled film in the same way you might avoid the airport on Thanksgiving weekend.
Remember "Hook"? Spielberg trying to make you smile is a painful, forced experience. By the end of this interminable movie, the corners of your mouth will feel like they've been yanked upward with sharp metal hooks for the better part of two hours.
Spielberg may be one of the greatest directors in film history, but with the notable exception of "E.T.," whimsy has never been his forte. With "The Terminal," he's aiming to deliver a Frank Capra-style fable full of uplifting sentiment about the human spirit,but the finished product is a beautifully lit mishmash of broad comedy, bad romance and emotional goo that only occasionally tugs your heart in the way that's intended.
The presence of Tom Hanks in the lead role of an Eastern European immigrant stranded in a New York city airport is a mixed bag, too,good because of the forceful conviction he brings to the role, but bad in that it brings to mind past Hanks ventures in a similar vein. That feeling of deja vu certainly doesn't help the story (credited to Sacha Gervasi and Jeff Nathanson, Spielberg's collaborator on "Catch Me If You Can") overcome its saccharine third act, a plodding stretch that cries out for a three-dimensional character like Wilson the volleyball to save the day.
Hanks plays Viktor, who, upon landing at Kennedy Airport, is immediately placed in limbo because his native country, Krakozhia,has undergone a coup. A Napoleonic airport official (Stanley Tucci)confiscates Viktor's visa and sends him off to the transit lounge,where Viktor is supposed to wait -- with his luggage and a handful of food vouchers -- until the war is over.
Stranded, this Gump-like castaway has a series of adventures,becoming a matchmaker, a crisis counselor, a master craftsman and a designer-suit-wearing sweetheart to an emotionally vulnerable airline stewardess (a poorly cast Catherine Zeta-Jones). Not bad for a guy who understood only a handful of English words when he walked off the plane.
Given the talent involved, the film's humor is surprisingly sophomoric. There's a running gag about people slipping on freshly mopped floors that Spielberg beats to death, and lots of confusion over Viktor's heavy accent, provided that it's convenient for the plot. (You know the gag: He says "cheat," but it sounds like the profane synonym for poo-poo. The conversation goes back and forth. "(Bleep)?" "Cheat." "(Bleep)?" "Cheat!" Abbott and Costello it ain't.)
Of course, when he needs to, Viktor can be a silver-tongued angel, an innocent in a strange land (he tries to "phooone hooome," to no avail), carrying a mysterious can of Planter's nuts. The contents of said can won't surprise anyone who has paid attention to Spielberg's career, but the execution of the movie certainly will. Tear up your boarding passes for this one.

Friday, March 10, 2006

Why can't Americans save a dime?

Why can't Americans save a dime?

MSN Money - Why can't Americans save a dime?

The Basics
Why can't Americans save a dime?
Remember when credit was just for homes and cars? For the first time since the Great Depression, Americans・savings rate has been negative for a year. By Christian Science MonitorIf Americans could be divided into savers and spenders, Courtney Davis knows exactly where she would fit. "I am a spender, through and through," she says. "I see how much is in my account, and that is how much I have to spend on a new outfit, a night out, or a great meal." But last month, Davis, a manager for a Boston think tank dealing with food issues, grew tired of having nothing in the bank. A broker arranged to have 20%of her salary deposited automatically into savings and investments. As she says, "It's the only way I can save, by not even getting a chance to get my mitts on it."As a non-saver, Davis has plenty of company. Americans' personal savings fell to -0.5% last year, the first time since the Depression that the savings rate has been negative for a year. Although that is just one measure of economic stability, it reflects how irresistible consumerism has become in the American psyche.
Looking for a loan?Check out MSN Money'sLoan Center"Other countries are not wrapped up in consumption as much as we are," says Larry Frank, author of "Wealth Odyssey : The Essential Road Map For Your Financial Journey Where Is It You Are Really Trying To Go With Money?・BR>"They like to have nice things, but it doesn't seem to be the benchmark where society is measured as a success. Having something saved is also part of that benchmark in other countries."

A new report from the Federal Reserve Bank Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances,・ finds that only 41% of Americans save regularly. Three-quarters of households carry debt.Americans' long journey on that road to debt began gradually after World War II. "Baby boomers' parents had access to credit, but in a responsible way, using it to buy durable goods -- a house, a car, a washing machine," says Shira Boss, author of "Green With Envy: Why Keeping Up With the Joneses Is Keeping Us in Debt,・to be published in May. "As baby-boomers grew up, they gradually started to see debt not as a way to get these durable goods but as a way to increase their lifestyle. They started sacrificing any future security for present-day comfort and entertainment."In 1981, Boss says, families saved an average of 11% and owed 4% of their income on credit cards. By 2000, the average savings rate had already fallen below zero, and credit-card debt had gone up to 12% of income. Today, she says, "boomers have a bigger problem with debt than anyone else. Half of them do not have a retirement account."For consumers as a whole, Boss sees a collective psychology prevailing. "We ask, 'What are others doing, and what can I get for myself?' Nobody wants to admit that there's anybody they're keeping up with, but we do collectively keep up with one another."Financial experts cite varied reasons for the lack of savings. Some are economic. Average weekly earnings decreased by 0.4% in 2005, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Housing, healthcare, and education costs have skyrocketed.Other reasons are cultural and attitudinal. "People don't remember the Depression," says Lewis Mandell, professor of finance at the University at Buffalo School of Management in New York. "People who are younger just really believe that nothing bad can happen to them. Either they think Social Security is going to be there for them when they retire, or they may feel that the government will never let them starve."A tactile sense of money Another culprit involves the changing idea of money. "We have lost a tactile sense of money," says Rakesh Gupta, associate dean of the School of Business at Adelphi University in Garden City, N.Y. "We're using plastic now. It doesn't seem like money. When we have a roll of money that gets smaller and smaller, we think about where we should spend it. Now that we can whip out a credit card or debit card, the pool of money seems endless."Popular culture plays a part as well. "People watch TV and think they have to live the life of characters on their shows," says DebtSmart.com creator Scott Bilker. "They start spending a little more."That spending often marks a generational shift. "What our parents saw as luxuries, people our age see as little indulgences," Davis says. "My mother would never spend $5 on a coffee. Some people do this every day." She adds, "My parents are appalled at the way I justify my spending. I think, 'Why work and make money unless you're going to enjoy it?' That's a fine theory until you're 60, homeless, and with no money in the bank."People intend to save, Bilker finds. "It's everyone's goal. They just don't do it. People are confident. Their home price has increased. They feel it's safe to spend. They're banking on future earnings."Cindy Lenox has good intentions. She runs a women's fitness center in Shrewsbury, N.J. She opened a savings account last month, hoping to deposit even $5 a week. It hasn't happened yet. "I own my own business, and there are weeks out of the month that I don't get a paycheck. For me, retirement is nonexistent. I think I'll be working for the rest of my life."Gail Cunningham, a vice president at Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Dallas, sees varied attitudes among her clients.Some tell her it's impossible to save. They rely on credit cards. Others defend their spending, even in a financial crisis. "They have to have cable TV, a cell phone, and their nails done," Cunningham says. Others open savings accounts but pull out money faster than they put it in. Without a nest egg, they cannot plan. "When they're worried about their car being repossessed tonight, the last thing they want to talk about today is their retirement savings."Cunningham has watched people's definitions of "need" and "want" change. When they get a raise or bonus, the first thing most think about is how to spend it, not how much they can earn through savings and investment.Changing attitudes is essential, retirement experts warn. As Social Security and defined-benefit pensions become less certain, and as life expectancies increase, the need for personal savings, including 401(k)s, will grow."People just do not have any idea what it takes to retire," Frank says.One solution: mandatory 401(k)sMost companies offering 401(k)s make participation voluntary. Some experts want enrollment to be automatic, although workers could refuse. Businesses using this format find that few people opt out."I don't think we have the political will to make it coercive, but switching 401(k) from opt-in to opt-out really takes care of a good deal of the problem," Mandell says. "People are very grateful. When you give them a structure, they're going to save."Jeff Seely, CEO of ShareBuilder.com, an online brokerage firm, offers other ideas to promote savings: "Do not let people borrow against their 401(k). This is your retirement money. Don't touch it." Those who change jobs should roll over their 401(k) into an IRA or the new employer's plan. Fifteen percent of people who leave jobs cash in their 401(k) when they leave, Seely says.Claire Celsi, a supervisor for an advertising firm in Des Moines, Iowa, also wants changes in banking practices. A single parent, she lives from paycheck to paycheck."The people who already have money are the only ones who get advantages -- free checking, better interest rates on credit cards," she says. "The fragile consumer, which I consider myself to be, gets kicked when they're down. Missing one payment can take your whole balance and charge you astronomical interest forever."A late credit-card payment could raise the interest rate to above 30%, Bilker notes. Some late fees now cost $40.Even lawmakers could help. "If the federal government continues to be in debt, to borrow to live today, why should the citizens not emulate the government?" Gupta asks. "They need to set the example by putting their fiscal house in order and encouraging citizens to do the same thing."As in many areas of life, education is crucial and can begin at home. Greg Turner, a vice president of an audiovisual company in Denver, saves 4% of his salary, beyond his investments and retirement plans. "I inherited the attitude about saving from my parents," he says.Although the negative savings rate is bad, Boss says, spending is healthy for the economy as a whole. "Nobody is trying to say we should hoard money or lock it up. You want money to circulate. You just don't want to spend more than you're making."Bilker offers his philosophy: "Living modestly and being happy with what you have -- therein lies the success of saving."For Davis, having a nest egg provides peace of mind. "Saving is one less thing I have to think about or worry about. Any money I spend is money that I can spend, and not money I should be putting away.

"By Marilyn Gardner, staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

U.S. Culture / A Japanese perspective on history

U.S. Culture / A Japanese perspective on history : The Language Connection : Features : DAILY YOMIURI ONLINE (The Daily Yomiuri)

U.S. Culture / A Japanese perspective on history : The Language Connection : Features : DAILY YOMIURI ONLINE (The Daily Yomiuri)

U.S. Culture / A Japanese perspective on history
Kimiko Manes Special to The Daily Yomiuri
Many of my students belong to the Pokemon generation: They grew up collecting Pokemon cards, bringing anime and manga culture straight into my Japanese class at the community college. The Japan these students learned about through pictures, animated or not, might be ideal for understanding Japanese living customs and daily actions of today, but rarely do students know the historical background behind those images. Therefore, their questions sometimes come across to me as being naive.
Here's a sample:
"American parents teach their children to be independent while in anime the characters all display group behavior. Japanese parents seem to expect their children to learn harmony among people."
"Characters in anime take forever to say, 'I love you' to someone they love."
"In America, it is considered common courtesy to look someone in the eye when speaking to them, but I've read that in Japan, it'll be considered an affront. It seems that Japanese customs are opposite those of the West."
I replied, "Historically, Japan was never invaded by a foreign power until World War II, which might be why a distinct value system emerged without foreign influence. During the late 13th century, China tried to invade Japan twice, but they weren't successful."
The two Chinese students in my class looked each other, perplexed. "Did we attack Japan?"
"Didn't you learn in history that Kublai Khan, the grandson of Genghis Khan, sent a navy to invade Japan?" I asked.
One of them replied, "That's Mongolia, not China."
This comment really struck me. Genghis Khan was indeed a Mongol. But Kublai Khan moved the capital to Beijing and founded the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368), which ruled China for close to a century. Not only that, the Yuan dynasty was geographically one of the most expansive empires on the Asian mainland. From the perspective of an outsider, it is part of Chinese history. But from the perspective of the Chinese today, that part of history is considered the "Mongolian occupation." To be sure, there are many ethnic groups in China, and at different points in history, different ethnic groups invaded, seized power and founded dynasties. It wasn't that I was oblivious to Chinese history, but I had never considered things from the perspective of those who lived there.
If we try to apply China's situation to Japan, it would be analogous to having part of history in which Japan was occupied by China, Korea or even Russia. While there were civil wars in Japan, the victors were always ethnically "Japanese." "When I followed this line of thinking, I realized the uniqueness of Japanese history. It can be said that the Japanese have never had to compromise or were coerced into creating a certain type of social order, but were free to make their own civilization.
In ancient times, the world developed by exchanging ideas. Europe and Asia are, really, one large continent that is also connected to Africa. Influenced by many factors, including wars and commerce, people were able to migrate across three continents. Many ethnic groups have come to Japan, too, but it was an archipelago at the end of Eurasia: People couldn't go any further, as the Pacific Ocean blocked their way. So they had to remain, and adapted to the land.
Climatically, I think Japan was a great place to live for these ancients. The parts of Japan that developed earliest were points west and south of the Kansai region. Yamaguchi Prefecture, situated at the center of this area, is in a zone where temperate and tropical plants coexist. The part of Japan that developed first didn't have the brutal cold of the continent, and neither did it have tropical diseases like malaria and amoebic dysentery.
Situated in the monsoon zone, it had plenty of rain, resulting in naturally soft water. Both the land and the sea provided food, and there were no predatory powers in the form of outside ethnic groups. It isn't a large place, but it must've been an easy place to make a living. Communities were built, and the beginnings of the Japanese civilization came to be.
In contrast, the Chinese tend to have strong familial and friendship ties, but fundamentally, I think they may have a more individualistic culture.
During the seventh and eighth centuries, the Japanese Imperial Court sent delegates to the Sui dynasty and Tang dynasty China. They brought philosophy, religion and technology back to Japan, much of it in text form.
In 1543, a drifting ship ended up on Tanegashima island off southern Kyushu and brought the first gun into Japan. Within a couple of years, guns were in production in many areas of Japan. In 1549, the missionary Francis Xavier brought Christianity to Japan, but in 1587, the shogun forbade missionary work, and in 1612, Christianity was made illegal.
The ban on Christianity occurred because the system of thought did not work well with the Japanese social order; in addition, it was to protect Japan from the Western attempts at colonization that inevitably followed missionaries at the time.
The shogunate knew that trade came along with Christianity, bringing wealth to Japan, but they had no choice but to prohibit Christianity. In 1635, Japan isolated itself from the world, a situation that lasted until U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry arrived and demanded the opening of Japan's doors in 1853. For nearly 2-1/2 centuries, Japan was free to explore its own values and philosophy without any interference from the outside, and the unique civilization of Japan blossomed.
It is interesting that Japan had established its own values and morals partly through the influence of imported philosophies and partly through mutual respect developed for survival in a group-oriented society, rather than having morals handed down by a particular religion or god. It's a unique quality setting Japan apart from Western morals, which were nurtured with religion and a god.
I don't think Japan's seclusion from the rest of the world and its refusal of Christianity on the one hand, and the enforcement of morals based on pride, honor, and discipline from the Kamakura period (1192-1333) on the other, are unrelated. Japan had boasted the lowest crime rate in the world until recently due to the strict adherence to pride, honor and discipline.
New ideas, philosophies, knowledge, technology and information are transmitted and evolve. But after these things have entered Japan, they had no way to flow out again due to mandated isolation. Perhaps because the Japanese have a long history of bringing in things from the outside and then changing them to suit their own likes and needs, they like to fiddle with new technologies.
This might also be because nothing, neither objects nor ideas, was ever forced upon them by an outside power. This also explains why anything that has come in from another place has not been adopted wholesale, but has been adapted for suitable use in a Japanese context. The way that kanji is used and the creation of hiragana and katakana are good examples.
Manes resides in Philadelphia and teaches Japanese at Bucks and Montgomery county community colleges. She is the author of "Culture Shock of Mind" (Sunmark Publishing Company; in Japanese). Manes may be contacted at maneskim@gmail.com.
(Feb. 21, 2006)

Smoking at work set to be banned by law in three years


Britain, UK news from The Times and The Sunday Times - Times Online
Note that there is also a debate forum at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,564-1661749,00.html
It's worth a look.

Britain, UK news from The Times and The Sunday Times - Times Online:
"June 21, 2005 June 21, 2005


Smoking at work set to be banned by law in three years
By Sam Lister, Health Correspondent

Smoking will become illegal in premises that serve food, such as the Caffè Nero franchise (PHOTO: BEN GURR)

NATIONAL restrictions on smoking will outlaw tobacco in almost all workplaces in England by the end of 2008, with lawbreakers subject to fines of up to £200 and the possibility of “shop-a-smoker” hotlines, the Government said yesterday. The Department of Health has outlined proposals for sweeping curbs on smoking, which include a ban in pubs that serve and prepare food, as well as railway stations, football stadiums and even bus shelters.

But the proposals, published for consultation yesterday, have been condemned by medical leaders and health campaigners for being “half-measures” that contain too many loopholes to make them enforceable. They said that nothing short of a blanket ban on smoking in enclosed public places would effect significant improvements in public health.

The plans include exemptions for drinking pubs — which may sell snacks but do not prepare and serve food — and private members’ clubs. Prisons, psychiatric units, care homes and other facilities that accommodate people for long periods of time are also exempt. The document contained little indication that ministers would move towards a total ban, despite suggestions that Patricia Hewitt, the Health Secretary, is more open to the idea than John Reid, her predecessor.

Caroline Flint, the Public Health Minister, said that the paper built on what was set out in last year’s public health White Paper. The period of consultation is scheduled to end on September 5.

“There are people in the medical profession who would prefer an outright ban,” she said. “When undertaking the consultation it was very clear that people did expect the Government to do more in this area with legislation. But they also felt there should be some consideration of the fact that cigarettes are not illegal and there should be some element of free choice.”

Ms Flint said that she expected the majority of smokers to follow the legislation but that some enforcement would be necessary.

Smoke-free areas will be identified with no-smoking signs, which will display a telephone number for people to contact to report infringements. Ms Flint said that enforcement officers with air-testing equipment would carry out “sting operations” to catch offenders. Enforcement will be the responsibility of councils, which will receive extra funding. Ms Flint said that it was difficult to gauge what the costs of enforcement would be, but she said that treating smoking-related ill health costs the NHS £1.7 billion a year.

Deborah Arnott, director of Action on Smoking and Health, said: “We are confident (exemptions) will be dropped once the Government assesses the result of the consultation process. We are within sight of the most important public health reform for 30 years.”

Pubs must choose whether to be classed as drinking pubs, where smoking is allowed and food cannot be served, or food pubs, where smoking is banned. Civil servants will draw up a limited list of snacks permitted at drinking pubs, which at present account for about 9,000 of England’s 60,000 pubs.

The document proposes the penalties that businesses and the public can expect if they flout the laws, including a £200 fine for businesses not displaying warning notices in non-smoking premises. A £200 penalty would also apply for managers who fail to prevent a person smoking on their premises, with £50 fixed- penalty notices for members of the public smoking in a smoke-free venue. The document includes the possibility that herbal cigarettes will not be banned in enclosed places because they do not contain tobacco.

Sam Everington, the deputy chairman of the British Medical Association, said: “Given it is acknowledged that second-hand smoke kills, the lives and health of employees must be the priority. It should not matter where an employee works. Whether someone works in an office or a non-food pub, they have a right to have their health protected at work.”

Simon Clark, director of the smokers’ lobby group Forest, called on the Government not to be pushed to a total ban. He said: “The majority of people want more no-smoking areas, separate rooms for smokers and better ventilation, not an outright ban.”